Analytical Methods of Dihydropyridines Based Calcium Channel Blockers - Amlodipine, Lacidipine, Isradipine, Nifedipine, Felodipine, Cilnidipine and its related formulations: A Review
Pankaj Kisan Chatki1*, Sana Tabassum2
1Analytical Research and Development Department, Neuheit Pharma Technologies Private Limited,
Hyderabad, Telangana-500 072 India.
2Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological Unversity, Hyderabad, Telangana-500 085 India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: pankajchatki22@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Objectives: Various analytical techniques are applied in pharmaceutical field to estimate the quality of active pharmaceutical ingredients, amount of drug in biological fluids and in formulations. The aim of this review article is to provide utmost existing analytical methods for analysis of dihydropyridines based calcium channel blockers for estimation of Amlodipine, Lacidipine, Isradipine, Nifedipine, Felodipine, and Cilnidipine in pure form, biological fluids (like Human Plasma, Human Serum, Human Urine etc.,) and its related formulations including novel formulations. Dihydropyridines based Calcium Channel blockers is a major chemical class of drugs used in the treatment of hypertension and various coronary artery diseases. Evidence acquisition: Current analytical techniques available for active pharmaceutical ingredients and its related formulations are tabulated with extensive method conditions which can be used in analysis of dihydropyridines based calcium channel blockers drugs outlined from official pharmacopoeias and other relevant research articles. Conclusion: Various analytical techniques such as HPLC, HPTLC, UPLC, GC, LC-MS, and GC-MS are involved. This review assists in appropriate selection of analytical technique, solvent, mobile phase, column, detector based on available analytical instruments and chemicals, by referring tabulated extensive method conditions. It can be implemented in quality control and quality assurance department for quality assessment of diverse pharmaceutical formulations.
KEYWORDS: Analytical techniques, Dihydropyridines, Calcium channel blockers, Hypertension, Coronary artery diseases.
INTRODUCTION:
Analytical techniques include titrimetric techniques, chromatographic techniques, and spectroscopic techniques. Chromatographic techniques include TLC, HPLC, GC. Spectroscopic techniques include Spectrophotometry, Infra red spectroscopy, Fluorimtery, Phosphorimetry, Electrochemical methods, Electrophoretic methods1. HPLC or LC is a powerful separation technique2,3. HPLC can be coupled with various spectroscopic techniques by the means of selection of the detector. HPLC hyphenated techniques are Ultra-violet Visible detector (UV), HPLC-MS Mass Spectrometer, HPLC-FTIR (Fourier-transform Infra-red Spectroscopy), HPLC-NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrophotometer), HPLC-RI (Refractive Index detector) 3-5. Electrochemical techniques have found widespread application as sensors for continuous analysis as well as for low resolution chromatograph 6. UPLC is a novel technique of Liquid chromatography. UPLC is more selective and sensitive with high resolution performance and faster resolving power. With UPLC increased resolution in shorter run times can generate more information faster without sacrifices. Higher sample throughput with more information per sample may decrease the time to market, an important driving force in today’s pharmaceutical industry 7, 8. UPLC is equipped with detectors such as Tunable Ultraviolet detector, Photodiode array detector, Fluorescence detector, Refractive index detector and mass detector9, 10.
Dihydropyridines are the most potent type of CCBs. Voltage sensitive channels, located on smooth muscles are blocked by the CCBs 11. CCBs have been used extensively in various cardiovascular conditions including ischemic heart diseases, supraventricular arrhythmias, systemic hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. They may have a role in many non-cardiac diseases like bronchial asthma, esophageal spasm, migraine, Reynaud’s phenomena and premature labor 12. The movement of calcium ions is essential for the function of all types of muscle, including cardiac muscle and vascular smooth muscle. For both cardiac and smooth muscle, the flow of calcium ions into the muscle cells through specific channels allows muscle contraction to occur. When calcium flow is reduced, this results in weakening of muscle contraction and relaxation of muscle tissue 13. CCBs inhibit the flow of extracellular calcium through ion-specific voltage gated channels that span the cell wall 14. CCBs or calcium antagonists are widely used drugs in treatment of hypertension and angina. CCBs exhibits its action by promoting vasodilator activity (and reduce blood pressure) by reducing calcium influx into vascular smooth muscle cells by interfering with voltage-operated calcium channels (and to a lesser extent receptor-operated channels) in the cell membrane15. There are two major classes of CCBs dihydropyridines, which are similar in chemical structure, and non-dihydropyridines, which are a structurally miscellaneous group. Widely used non-dihydropyridines CCBs are Verapamil and Diltiazem. Dihydropyridines derivatives have pronounced peripheral vasodilator properties and intense reflex cardiac stimulation overcomes any direct cardiac effects. Verapamil and Diltiazem are also vasodilators but the balance of actions is such that these drugs have noticeable cardiac effects including reduced heart rate13, 15, 16. Various dihydropyridines based calcium channel blocker drugs are Amlodipine, Nifedipine, Felodipine, Clevidipine, Nimodipine, Isradipine, Nicardipine, Lercanidipine, Benidipine, Aranidipine, Azelnidipine, Barnidipine, Cilnidipine, Efonidipine, Manidipine, Lacidipine, Nicardipine, Nitrendipine, Nilvadipine, Nisoldipine, Pranidipine. Drugs have different binding sites to exhibit its action. CCBs have similar efficacy in terms of blood pressure lowering effects CCBs differ in tolerability profiles 17-21.
Amlodipine besylate is the besylate salt of Amlodipine, a long-acting CCB. Amlodipine besylate is a white crystalline powder. It is slightly soluble in water, freely soluble in methanol and sparingly soluble in ethanol. Its Molecular formula is C20H25ClN2O5•C6H6O3S. Amlodipine besylate is chemically described as 3-Ethyl-5-methyl (±)-2-[(2-aminoethoxy) methyl]-4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1, 4-dihydro-6-methyl-3, 5 pyridine dicarboxylate, monobenzenesulphonate. Molecular weight of Amlodipine besylate is 567.1. Amlodipine is an official drug in United States Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia. It is used as racemic mixture, only S-(-) enantiomer is pharmacologically active whereas R (+)-enantiomer is thousand-fold less active 22-25. Analytical methods described in literature and pharmacopoeias for determination of Amlodipine besylate in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations are listed in table 1.
Table 1- Analytical Methods for Amlodipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations
Technique |
Extensive Method Conditions |
Detection outline |
Form |
References |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (150 mm × 3.9-mm) · MP-pH 3.0 triethylamine Buffer, methanol, and acetonitrile (50:35:15%V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 237 nm |
API and tablets |
[26] |
HPLC |
· Column-C-18 (25mm ×4mm, 5µm) · MP-2.3 g/L solution of ammonium acetate R, methanol R (30:70 % V/V). · Flow rate-1.5 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC |
λ- 237 nm |
API |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column- Kinetex C-18 (100 mm×4.6 mm, 2.6µm) · MP- MP-A: pH 3.0 Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (0.03 M) and Methanol (45:55 % V/V). MP-B: pH 3.0 Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (0.03 M) and Methanol (30:70 % V/V). Gradient mode of elution. · Flow rate: 0.6 mL/min. |
λ- 238 nm |
Tablets and oral solution |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column-C-18 (150 mm × 3.9 mm, 5 µm) · MP-pH 3.0 triethylamine Buffer, methanol, and acetonitrile (50:35:15%V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 237 nm |
API and Tablets |
[28] |
HPLC |
· Column-WATERS C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, pH 3.0 Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate and Methanol (50:35:15 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 240 nm |
Tablets |
[29] |
LC-MS |
· Column-ZORBAX SB C-18 (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm) · MP- 5 mM ammonium acetate in 0.1 % formic acid, Methanol and Acetonitrile (30:30:40 % V/V) · Flow rate-0.7 mL/min. |
- |
Human Plasma |
[30] |
HPLC |
· Column- Phenomenex Luna C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and Acetate buffer (50:50 % V/V) pH mobile phase set as 5. · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 232 nm UV detector |
API and Tablets |
[31] |
HPLC |
· Column-WATERS C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- pH 6.4 Potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (10 mM), Acetonitrile and Methanol (20:70:10 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-28ºC |
λ- 360 nm |
Human Plasma |
[32] |
HPLC |
· Column- C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 0.05 M Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate buffer and Acetonitrile (45:55 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.5 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 465 nm, Photodiode array detector, Sodium 1, 2-naphthoquinone-4-sulfonate (NQS) reagent is used |
API
|
[33] |
HPLC |
· Column-Zodiac C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Methanol, Acetonitrile and pH 5.8 0.01M orthophosphoric acid solution. (75:23:2 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 236 nm |
API and Tablets |
[34] |
HPLC |
· Column-Hypersil BDS C8 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- pH phosphate buffer and Acetonitrile (65:25 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.5 mL/min. |
λ- 237 nm |
Tablets |
[35] |
LC-MS |
· Column-WATERS C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Methanol and pH 5.0 Phosphate buffer with gradient mode of elution. · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 240 nm UV Visible detector |
API |
[36] |
UV |
· Solvent-Ammonium acetate, potassium acetate and nicotinamide solution, hydrotropic Solubilization technique used |
λ- 243 nm |
API |
[37] |
UV |
· Solvent- 0.01 % orthophosphoric acid solution and further dilution with water. |
λ- 366 nm |
Tablets |
[38] |
HPLC |
· Column-Zorbex Eclipse C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) MP- pH 3.0 Orthophosphoric acid buffer and Methanol (40:60 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC |
λ- 239 nm UV Visible detector |
Oral films |
[39] |
HPLC |
· Column-Ascentis C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and 0.1 % Trifluoroacetic acid Solution (40:60 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC |
λ- 237 nm UV Visible detector |
Tablets |
[40] |
Spectro-fluorimetric |
· Solvent-Ethanol |
Fluorescence Detector, Excitation λ- 360 nm and emission λ- 440 nm |
Plasma
|
[41] |
Tandem LC-MS |
· Column-Hypurity C-18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 5 µm) MP- Acetonitrile and 0.1 % Formic acid Solution (90:10 % V/V) · Column temperature-40ºC |
Positive ionization detector |
Human Plasma |
[42] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Phenomenex Luna C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 10 mM ammonium formate, Methanol and Acetonitrile (30:50:20 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC
|
Electron spray Ionization |
Human Plasma |
[43] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Diamond C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- methanol mixed with 10 mM ammonium acetate solution, with gradient flow rates and varied ratio of mobile phase · Column temperature-30ºC · Gas temperature -350°C · Spray gas pressure -350 Pascals · Capillary voltage -4000 V · Nebulizer pressure (45 psi) |
Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an Electrospray ionization source |
Human Plasma |
[44] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Princeton SPHER C-18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and 10 mM Ammonium acetate (90:10 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC · Turbo ion spray source temperature - 37.5°C · Turbo ion spray voltage was set at 5500 V. |
Electron spray Ionization |
Human Plasma |
[45] |
Table 2: Analytical Methods for Lacidipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations
Technique |
Extensive Method Conditions |
Detection outline |
Form |
References |
HPLC |
· Column- Cyanosilyl silica gel, Spherisorb CN (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Absolute ethanol and n-Hexane (3 : 97 %V/V) · Flow rate-2.0 mL/min. |
λ- 240 nm |
API and tablets |
[27] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Zorbex SB C-18 (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 5 mM Ammonium acetate buffer and Acetonitrile (15:85 % V/V) · Flow rate-0.6 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC · Turbo ion spray source temperature - 450°C · Nebulizer gas pressure-35 psi. |
Electron spray Ionization-Turbo ion spray |
Human Plasma |
[48] |
HPLC |
· Column- Thermo Hypersil BDS C-18 (75 mm × 3.5 mm, 3 µm) · MP-pH 6.5 Ammonium acetate buffer and Methanol (30 : 70 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 242 nm Photodiode array detector |
Tablets |
[49] |
HPLC |
· Column- X-Bridge C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and 5 mM Ammonium acetate buffer (95 : 5 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC |
λ- 240 nm Photodiode array detector |
API and Tablets |
[50] |
UV |
· Solvent- Methanol |
λ- 218 nm |
Tablets |
[51] |
HPTLC |
· Stationary Phase-TLC aluminium plate precoated with silica gel 60F254. · MP- Toluene and Ethyl acetate (65 : 35 %V/V) |
- |
Urine |
[52] |
HPLC |
· Column- Phenomenex Luna C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-pH4.5 Ammonium acetate buffer and Methanol (30 : 70 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 240 nm Photodiode array detector |
Tablets |
[53] |
UPLC |
· Column- Waters Acquity BEH C-18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) · MP- pH4.5 Ammonium acetate buffer and Methanol (70 : 30 %V/V) · Flow rate-0.25 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 240 nm
|
Tablets |
[54, 55] |
HPLC |
· Column- RP Shim Pack GWS C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and Water, pH adjusted to 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid (85 : 15 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. |
λ- 239 nm Photodiode array detector |
API |
[56] |
HPLC |
· Column- Lichrospher C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and 5 mM Ammonium acetate (85 : 15 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 240 nm
|
Niosomal gel in rat plasma |
[57] |
UV |
· Solvent- Methanol |
Zero order λ- 284 nm and first order λ- 277 nm |
API and Tablets |
[58] |
UPLC-MS |
· Column- Thermo C-18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and Water containing 0.1 % Formic acid (83 : 17 %V/V) · Flow rate-0.2 mL/min. |
Waters Tandem Qudrapole detector
|
Dog Plasma |
[59] |
HPLC |
· Column- Grace Vydac RP C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and pH 0.1 Triethylamine (90 : 10 %V/V) · Flow rate-0.8 mL/min. |
λ- 240 nm
|
Nanoform-ulations |
[60] |
Table 3: Analytical Methods for Isradipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations
Technique |
Extensive Method Conditions |
Detection outline |
Form |
References |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm) · MP-Methanol, Tetrahydrofuran and Water (40:10:50 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.7 mL/min. |
λ- 326 nm |
API and tablets |
[26] |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Methanol, Tetrahydrofuran and Water (42:20:38 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 240 nm |
Compounded oral solution |
[26] |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Tetrahydrofuran and Water (12.5:27:62.5 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. |
λ- 326 nm |
API and tablets |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column-Bondapak C-18 · MP-Methanol, Acetonitrile and pH 2.8 acetate buffer (60:30:10 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 290 nm |
Capsules |
[63] |
HPLC |
· Column- Agilent Zorbex C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Methanol, Acetonitrile and 0.1 % Orthophosphoric acid solution (55:35:10 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC |
λ- 326 nm |
Tablets |
[64] |
HPLC |
· Column- Kromasil C-18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Water, Methanol and Tetrahydrofuran (50:40:10 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.4 mL/min. |
λ- 330 nm |
Tablets |
[65] |
HPLC |
· Column- Bondapak C-18 (5 µm) · MP- Methanol and Water (70:30 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 290 nm |
Capsules |
[66] |
UV |
· Solvent- Methanol : Chloroform(70:30 %V/V) |
λ- 327 nm |
Solid Lipid Nano-particles |
[67] |
UPLC-MS |
· Column- Waters Acquity BEH C-18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile, Water and Formic Acid (80:20:0.3 % V/V/V) · Flow rate-0.2 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC · Ion source temperature - 500°C · Nebulizer gas pressure-50 psi. |
Triple Quadrupole Tandem Mass Spectrometer |
Dog Plasma |
[68] |
HPLC |
· Column- Chiralpak AD · MP- Heaxane, 2-Propanol and Ethanol (94:4:2 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.5 mL/min. |
λ- 325 nm |
HF-LPME |
[69] |
HPLC
|
· Column- Aluspher RP- Select B (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-0.1 M Britton–Robinson Buffer (pH 11.8), Acetonitrile and Methanol (60:30:10 % V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 330 nm (Electro-chemical detection) |
Human Serum |
[70] |
LC-MS |
· Column- XTerra MS C-18 (100 mm × 3 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 0.1 % Formic acid and (Mixture of 75 parts of Acetonitrile an 25 parts of Methanol) (42:58 % V/V) · Flow rate-0.5 mL/min. |
Turbo-ion spray detection |
Human Plasma |
[71] |
Felodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist reversibly competes with Nitrendipine and/or other calcium channel blockers for dihydropyridine binding sites, blocks voltage-dependent calcium channels72, 73. Felodipine is a white or light-yellow crystalline powder. It is freely soluble in acetone, in anhydrous ethanol, in methanol and in methylene chloride and practically insoluble in water. Its Molecular formula is C18H19Cl2NO4. Felodipine is chemically described as 3, 5-Pyridinedicarboxylic acid 4-(2, 3-dichlorophenyl)-1, 4-dihydro-2, 6-dimethyl-, ethyl methyl ester. Molecular weight of Felodipine is 384.25. Felodipine is an official drug in United States Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia26, 27. In-vitro studies show that the effects of Felodipine on contractile processes are selective, with greater effects on vascular smooth muscle than cardiac muscle without altering calcium level in serum. Negative ionotropic effects can be detected in-vitro, but such effects have not been seen in intact animals. The effect of Felodipine on blood pressure is principally a consequence of a dose-related decrease of peripheral vascular resistance in man, with a modest reflex increase in heart rate72, 73. Analytical methods described in literature and pharmacopoeias for determination of Felodipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations are listed in table 4.
Table 4: Analytical Methods for Felodipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations
Technique |
Extensive Method Conditions |
Detection outline |
Form |
References |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Methanol, and pH 3.0 Monobasic sodium phosphate buffer (40:20:40 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 254 nm |
API |
[26, 27] |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 4 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Methanol, and pH 3.0 Monobasic sodium phosphate buffer (40:20:40 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 362 nm |
Extended Release tablets |
[26] |
Titration |
· Redox Titration · Titrant- 0.1 M Cerium Sulfate. · Solvent for analyte (0.16g) 25:25 mixture of 2-methyl-2-propanol and perchloric acid solution. · Indicator-Ferroin solution. · 1 mL Cerium Sulfate is equivalent to 19.21 mg of Felodipine. |
End point –Pink to colorless. |
API(Assay) |
[27, 28] |
HPLC |
· Column-Waters Novapak C-18 (150 mm × 3.9 mm, 4 µm) · MP-(pH 3.0, 0.08% w/v of orthophosphoric acid R and 0.8% w/v of sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate), Methanol and Acetonitrile (40:20:40 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 254 nm |
Prolonged Release tablets |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column-Zorbex C-18 · MP-Sodium acetate buffer and Acetonitrile (30:70 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. |
λ- 237 nm |
Extended Release tablets |
[74] |
HPLC |
· Column-Waters Symmetry C-18 (250 mm × 4.5 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and Water (80:20 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 234 nm |
API |
[75] |
UV |
· Solvent –Ethanol(green solvent) |
λ- 363.5 nm |
API and Tablets |
[76] |
HPLC |
· Column-ODS C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and Water (80:20 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-35ºC |
λ- 305 nm |
API and Tablets |
[77] |
HPLC |
· Column- HIQ Sil C 18 HS (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Methanol and pH 3.0 phosphate buffer (83:17 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-0.8 mL/min. |
λ- 232 nm |
API and Agglomerates |
[78]
|
LC-MS |
· Column-Zorbax SB C-18 (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm) · MP- pH 4.0 Ammonium acetate buffer and Methanol(30:70 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-50ºC |
Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization source |
Human Plasma |
[79] |
HPLC |
· Column-Inertsil ODS C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- pH 4.5 phosphate buffer Acetonitrile and Methanol (40:40:20 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 362 nm |
API and Capsules |
[80] |
HPTLC |
· Stationary Phase for Normal HPTLC-200 × 100 mm pre-coated aluminum plates with 250 μm layer of silica gel 60 F254. · Stationary Phase for Reverse Phase HPTLC- 200 × 100 mm pre-coated aluminum plates with 250 μm layer of Silica gel 60 RP-18 TLC F254S · MP for Normal HPTLC-Toluene and Methanol (80:20 % v/v) · MP-for Reverse Phase HPTLC-Acetonitrile, Water and Glacial acetic acid (80:20:10 %V/VV) |
λ- 237 nm Densitometry
|
API and Tablets |
[81] |
HPLC |
· Column-Inertsil ODS C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- pH 7.0 phosphate buffer and Acetonitrile (20:80 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. |
λ- 234 nm |
Tablets |
[82] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Princeton SPHER C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and 2mM ammonium acetate (80:20 %V/V) · Flow rate-0.8 mL/min. · Gas temperature-250ºC |
Electron Spray Ionization |
Human Plasma |
[83] |
HPLC |
· Column-Kromasil C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Methanol, Acetonitrile and Water (50:15:35 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 238 nm |
Tablets |
[84] |
HPLC |
· Column- C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 10 mM Tetra butyl ammonium hydrogen sulphate and Acetonitrile (18:82 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. |
λ- 237 nm |
Tablets |
[85] |
HPLC |
· Column-Waters Symmetry C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and Water (80:20 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 243 nm |
API |
[86] |
HPLC |
· Column-Luna C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- pH 3.0 phosphate buffer and Methanol (83:17 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 275 nm |
API and Tablets |
[87] |
Micellar HPLC |
· Column- C-18 · MP- Micellar mobile phase 85 mM sodium dodecyl sulphate, 25 mM phosphate buffer and 6.5% pentanol at pH 7. · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
Fluorescence Detector, Excitation λ- 240 nm and emission λ- 440 nm |
Human Plasma |
[88] |
NIFEDIPINE:
Nifedipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist inhibits the entry of calcium ions by blocking voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle and myocardial cells. The reduced intra-cellular calcium, results in reduction of peripheral arterial vascular resistance and dilation of coronary arteries, leading to a reduction in systemic blood pressure and increased myocardial oxygen delivery89. Nifedipine is a yellow crystalline powder. It is freely soluble in acetone, sparingly soluble in ethanol and practically insoluble in water. Its Molecular formula is C17H18N2O6. Nifedipine is chemically described a 3, 5-Pyridinedicarboxylic acid, 1, 4-dihydro-2, 6-dimethyl-4-(2-nitrophenyl)-, dimethyl ester. Molecular weight of Nifedipine is 346.3. When exposed to daylight and to artificial light of certain wavelengths, it readily converts to a nitroso-phenyl pyridine derivative. Exposure to ultraviolet light leads to the formation of a nitro-phenyl pyridine derivative. Nifedipine is an official drug in United States Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia26, 27. Nifedipine dilates the main coronary arteries and coronary arterioles, both in normal and ischemic regions, and is a potent inhibitor of coronary artery spasm, whether spontaneous or ergonovine-induced. This property increases myocardial oxygen delivery in patients with coronary artery spasm, and is responsible for the effectiveness of Nifedipine in Vasospastic (Prinzmetal’s or variant) angina 90. Analytical methods described in literature and pharmacopoeias for determination of Nifedipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations are listed in table 5.
Table 5: Analytical Methods for Nifedipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations
Technique |
Extensive Method Conditions |
Detection outline |
Form |
References |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Methanol, and Water (25:25:50 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 235 nm |
API and Extended Release tablets |
[26] |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Methanol, and Water (25:25:50 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 265 nm |
Capsules |
[26] |
Titration |
· Redox Titration · Titrant- 0.1 M Cerium Sulfate. · Solvent for analyte (0.13g) 25:25 mixture of 2-methyl-2-propanol and perchloric acid solution. · Indicator-Ferroin solution. · 1 mL Cerium Sulfate is equivalent to 17.32 mg of Felodipine. |
End point –Pink to colorless. |
API |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column-Lichrosorb C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Methanol, and Water (9:36:55 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 235 nm |
Prolonged Release tablets |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column-Hypersil C-18 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and 0.03 % Orthophosphoric acid solution. (40:60 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 235 nm |
Capsules |
[27] |
HPLC |
· Column-L1 or C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile, Methanol, and Water (9:36:55 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 235 nm |
Prolonged Release Capsules |
[27] |
UPLC |
· Column-Sunniest C-18 HT (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 2 µm) · MP-Mobile phase-A (Water: Acetonitrile, 95:5 %V/V) and Mobile Phase-B 0.5 mL of Formic acid in 1 liter of Acetonitrile, with gradient mode of elution. · Flow rate-0.7 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC |
λ- 335 nm |
API |
[91] |
HPLC |
· Column- Phenomena Luna C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and pH 7.4 0.1 % Triethylamine (78:22 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 326 nm |
Novel Proniosomes |
[92] |
HPLC |
· Column- Nucleosil C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- pH 3.0 disodium hydrogen phosphate, Methanol and Acetonitrile (37:40:23 %V/V/V) · Flow rate-0.8 mL/min. |
λ- 238 nm |
API, Plasma and Sustained Release Tablets |
[93] |
HPLC |
· Column- Purospher Star C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitirle and pH 3.0 phosphate Buffer (40:60 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
UV Visible |
Tablets, Human milk and Urine |
[94] |
UPLC-MS |
· Column- Phenomenex C-18 (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile and pH 3.5 Ammonium formate buffer, 5 mM (60:40 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-35ºC |
Electron Spray ionization |
Human Plasma |
[95] |
UV (Oxidative coupling) |
· Solvent-Methanol · MBTH reagent (3- methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone) |
Visible λ- 685 nm (green color) |
API, tablet, Serum, Urine |
[96] |
· Brucine sodium iodated solution |
λ- 546 nm (violet color) |
|||
HPLC |
· Column- Phenomenex Luna C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 0.01 M Ammonium formate solution, Methanol and Acetonitrile (55:43:2 %V/V/V) and pH was adjusted to 4.9 with formic acid. · Flow rate-0.8 mL/min. · Column temperature-37ºC |
λ- 235 nm |
Rat Plasma |
[97] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Hypersil Gold C-18 (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- 0.1 % Formic Acid buffer and Acetonitrile (30:70 % V/V) · Flow rate-0.6 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC · Gas temperature-450ºC |
Triple Qudrapole mass detector |
Human Plasma |
[98] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Zorbex SB C-8 (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.5 µm) · MP- pH 4.0 10mM Ammonium Acetate solution and Methanol (30:70 % V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. · Column temperature-40ºC · Gas temperature-300ºC
|
Multiple reaction monitoring mode |
Human Plasma |
[99] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Agilent Eclipse Plus C-18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 3.5 µm) · MP- 0.1 % Formic Acid buffer and Acetonitrile with gradient mode of elution. · Flow rate-0.3 mL/min. · Column temperature-30ºC · Gas temperature-320ºC |
Electron Spray Ionization by Multiple reaction monitoring mode |
Injection- Rat plasma |
[100] |
Visible Spectro-phometry |
· Absorbance spectra of was analysed using Non-Destructive Visible Spectrophotometry Technique, using tungsten halogen lamp as source. · Analysed by placing film in sample holder. |
Scanned from 400 nm to 800 nm. |
Transdermal Drug Delivery System. |
[101] |
HPTLC |
· Stationary Phase –Pre-coated silica gel 60- F254 on aluminium sheet (100 × 100 mm, 0.2 mm thickness) TLC plates. · MP – Acetonitrile, Methanol, n-Butanol and Acetic acid (6:2:2:1:0.1 V/VV/V) |
λ- 230 nm Densitometry
|
API |
[102] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Lichrocrat C-18 (125 mm × 4 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Water, Acetonitrile and Glacial acetic acid (30:70:0.5 V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
Tandem Mass Spectrometer |
Human Plasma and Amniotic fluid |
[103] |
LC-MS |
· Column- Supelco C-18 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP- Acetonitrile, Methanol and Water (35:17:48% V/V/V) · Flow rate-1.2 mL/min. |
Tandem Mass Spectrometer |
Human Plasma |
[104] |
Micellar HPLC |
· Column- C-18 · Micellar MP- 0.125 M Sodiumdodecylsulfate and 3% Pentanol, pH adjusted to 3. |
λ- 235 nm
|
Serum and Urine |
[105] |
Differential Pulse Voltametry |
· Buffer- pH 8 Britton Robinson Buffer. · Reference Electrode-Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode. · Working Electrode-Mercury Meniscus Modified Silver Solid Amalgam Electrode. |
Polarograph |
API |
[106] |
GC |
· Column-Methyl silica fused-silica column. · Gas-Helium gas-20ml/min. Hydrogen gas-3.5 ml/min. |
Nitrogen-phosphorous ionization detector |
Human Plasma |
[107] |
GC |
· Column- Packed column OV-17 or OV-1 · Gas-Argon and Methane (95:5 % V/V) 30ml/min. |
Pulsed 63-Ni electron capture detector (ECD) |
Human Serum |
[108] |
Cilnidipine is a promising fourth generation dual L/N type dihydropyridine calcium antagonist109. Cilnidipine is a pale yellow powder. It is sparingly soluble in chloroform and methanol. Its Molecular formula is C27H28N2O7. Cilnidipine is chemically described a 1, 4-Dihydro-2, 6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-3, 5-pyridinedicarboxylic Acid 2-Methoxyethyl (2E)-3-Phenyl-2-propenyl Ester. Molecular weight of Cilnidipine is 492.52110, 111. An N-/L-type calcium channel blocker, Cilnidipine, suppresses autonomic, electrical, and structural remodeling associated with atrial fibrillation. The blockade of N-type calcium channels results in neuro-hormonal regulation in the cardiovascular system. This results in favorable effects in the prevention of number of complications of hypertension, prevention of progression of proteinuria and renal disease. Based on study on hypertensive patients with respect to tolerability, it concluded that Cilnidipine is better than Amlodipine109, 112, 113. Both Amlodipine and Cilnidipine have equal efficacy in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. But Cilnidipine being N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker, associated with lower incidence of pedal edema compared to only L-type channel blocked by Amlodipine114. Major side effect upon long term usage of Cilnidipine is gingival overgrowth115. Analytical methods described in literature for determination of in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations are listed in table 6.
Table 6: Analytical Methods for Cilnidipine in pure form (API), biological fluids and its related formulations
Technique |
Extensive Method Conditions |
Detection outline |
Form |
References |
HPLC |
· Column-Princeton Spher C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and pH 4.5, 0.05 M Potassium dihydrogen Orthophosphate buffer. (60:40 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 260 nm |
Human Plasma |
[116] |
UV |
· Solvent -Ethanol. |
λ- 240 nm |
API and Tablets |
[117] |
HPLC |
· Column-Thermo Scientific C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and Methanol (50:50 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 242 nm |
API |
[118] |
HPLC |
· Column-Cosmosil C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Acetonitrile and Potassium dihydrogen Phosphate buffer(50:50 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 241 nm |
API |
[119] |
UV |
· Using Potassium Hydroxide in Dimethyl Sulfoxide as reagent · Solvent -Methanol |
λ- 425 nm |
API and Tablets |
[120] |
UV |
· Using N-(1-Naphthyl) ethylene Diamine dihydrochloride reagent as reagent. · Solvent -Methanol |
λ- 554 nm |
API and Tablets |
[121] |
HPTLC |
· Stationary Phase –Pre-coated silica gel 60- F254 on aluminium sheet TLC plates. · MP – Toluene and Ethyl acetate. (60:40 % V/V) |
λ- 238 nm Densitometry
|
API and Tablets |
[122] |
LC-MS |
· Column-Cyanide C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-10 mM Ammonium Acetate buffer: Methanol (30:70 %V/V), adjusted to pH 5.0 with acetic acid · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
Tandem Mass Spectrometer |
Human Plasma |
[123] |
HPLC |
· Column-Grace C-18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) · MP-Metthanol and pH 3.0 0.05 M Phosphate buffer (80:20 %V/V) · Flow rate-1.0 mL/min. |
λ- 254 nm |
API and Tablets |
[124] |
CONCLUSION:
CCBs are widely used drugs for the treatment of hypertension and various coronary artery diseases. Various analytical methods tabulated for Amlodipine, Lacidipine, Isradipine, Felodipine, Nifedipine and Cilnidipine were obtained from literature survey of pharmacopoeias and research articles. The developed methods supported in understanding the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug interactions with the organism, developing pharmaceutical formulations, and determining the toxicity of these compounds. This review assists readers for application in routine analysis for quality assessment of pharmaceutical formulations and gives idea for further improvement of techniques. Based on survey, novel analytical techniques such as HPLC, HPTLC, LC-MS, GC, GC-MS and some simple spectrophotometric techniques are involved. Tabulated extensive method conditions gives support analyst in selection of analytical technique, solvent, mobile phase, column and detector for drugs. Selection can be done based on available chemicals and analytical instrument by referring the extensive method conditions tabulated for drugs.
List of Abbreviations:
HPLC - High Performance Liquid Chromatography;
GC - Gas Chromatography;
TLC - Thin Layer Chromatography;
LC - Liquid Chromatography;
LC-MS - Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry;
UPLC - Upper Performance Liquid Chromatography;
CCBs - Calcium Channel Blockers;
UV - Ultra-Violet Spectrophotometry;
API - Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient;
MP - Mobile Phase;
%V/V - Percentage volume by volume. (Mobile Phase compositions);
Mm - Millimeter;
µm - Micrometer;
mM - Milli molar;
λ - Lamda max;
C-18 - Octadecylsilyl silica gel packed column;
HPTLC - High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography;
HF-LPME - Hollow fiber based liquid phase micro-extraction.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
We declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Masoom Raza Siddiqui, Zeid AlOthamn A, Nafisur Rahman. Analytical Techniques in Pharmaceutical analysis: A Review. Arabian Journal of Chemistry.2013; 10:1409-21.
2. Imran Khan, Krantisri Mulpu, Byasabhusan Das, Mohiuddin MD, Mohd Haseeb Ur Rahman. Analytical Techniques (Chromatography, Spectroscopy and Electrophoresis) in Pharmaceutical analysis: A Review. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nanosciences. 2015; 4: 19-27.
3. Kaushal Ramni, Kaur Navneet, Upadhyay Ashutosh, Suri OP, Thakkar Arti. High Performance Liquid Chromatography Detectors- A Review. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2011; 2: 1-7.
4. Michael Swartz. HPLC Detectors- A Brief Review. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 2010; 33: 1130-50.
5. ShodexTM. Lesson 6: Detectors of HPLC. Available from URL: https://www.shodex.com/en/kouza/f.html
6. Bernard Fleet, Little CJ. Design and Evaluation of Electrochemical Detectors for HPLC. Journal of Chromatographic Science.1974; 3: 747-52. Available from URL:https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/12.12.747
7. Swetha Sri R, Dr Bhavya Sri K, Mounika Ch. A Review on Comparative study of HPLC and UPLC. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2013; 13(3): 1570-1574.
8. Gita Chawla, Chanda Ranjan. Principle, Instrumentation and Applications of UPLC: A Novel Technique of Liquid Chromatography. Open Journal Chemistry.2016; 3:1-16.
9. M M Eswarudu, M Chinna Eswaraiah, K Prasanna Kumar and K Sudhakar. Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC): A Preeminent Technique in Pharmaceutical Analysis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology2012; 5(12):1484-1489.
10. Sayyed Hussain, Dr Tabrez Shaikh. Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography: A New Trend in Analysis. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.2016; 5: 387-94.
11. Tripathi KD Editor. Immunosuppressant Drugs. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Ltd.2013; 7th ed: pp. 546-49.
12. Seth SD, Sandeep Seth. Calcium Channels and Calcium Channel Blocker. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.1991; 35:217-31.
13. Therapeutic Class Overview Calcium Channel Blocking Agents (Dihydropyridines). OPTUM. Available from URL:https://www.medicaid.nv.gov/Downloads/provider/Calcium_Channel_Blockers_NON-Dihy_2017-09.pdf
14. William J, Venkata Ram CS. Calcium Channels Blocker. Journal of Clinical Hypertension.2011; 13:687-9.
15. Drug Classes, Calcium Channel Blockers. British and Irish Hypertension Society. 2017. Available from URL: https://bihsoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Calcium-Channel-Blockers-Final-2017.pdf.
16. Joseph Flynn T, Deborah Pasko A. Calcium channel blockers: Pharmacology and Place in Therapy of Pediatric Hypertension. Pediatric Nephrology.2000; 15:302-16.
17. Franz Messerli H, Georg Noll, Lars Lindholm H, Hermann Haller, Luis Ruilope M, Massimo Volpe. The Role of Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease - An Update. European Cardiology Review. 2006; 2:1-6.
18. Prof. Michael Barry. Medicines Management Programme Preferred Drugs, Calcium Channel Blockers (dihydropyridine derivatives) for the Treatment of Hypertension and Stable Angina. Version-1.2016. Available from URL:https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/clinical-strategy-and programmes/calcium-channel-blockers-report.pdf
19. Opie LH. Pharmacological differences among Calcium Channel Antagonists. European Heart Journal.1997; 18: A71-79.
20. Guang Wang Ji, Kazuomi Kario, Titus Lau, Yong Quek Wei, Chang Gyu Park, Cheol Ho Kim, Jun Huang, Weizhong Zhang, Yong Li, Peter Yan, Dayi Hu. Use of Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers in the Management of Hypertension in Eastern Asians: A scientific statement from the Asian Pacific Heart Association. Hypertension Research.2011; 34:423-30.
21. Ferrari R. Major Differences among the three classes of Calcium Antagonists. European Heart Journal.1997; 18: A56-70.
22. Amlodipine besylate Tablets-FDA. Available from URL: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/019787s042lbl.pdf. Accessed on April 2007.
23. Syed Furqan Ahsan, Marium Fatima Khan. Physicochemical Properties and Pharmacology of Amlodipine Besylate: A Brief Review. Baqai Journal of Health Sciences. 2017; 20: 27-31.
24. Mustafa Sinan Kaynak, Agata Bogacz, Michał Stelmasin´ Ski, Selma Şahin. Bioavailability File: Amlodipine. FABAD Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 36: 207-22.
25. Helal Uddina ABM, Mohamed Alaamaa, Zaidul ISM, Abbas SA, Mohamed Awang, Fahim TK. Current Analytical Methods for Amlodipine and its Formulations: A Review.Journal CLeanWAS.2017; 1:17-22.
26. United States Pharmacopoeia. Govt. of US. Official Monographs from United States Pharmacopoeia. United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc.USP42-NF37. 2019.
27. British Pharmacopoeia. Official Monographs from British Pharmacopoeia. BP 2020, Ph. Eur.10.0 update. 2020.
28. Indian Pharmacopoeia. Official Monographs from Indian Pharmacopoeia. Govt. of India Vol-III. Ghaziabad: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Published by The Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. IP 2010.
29. Richa Sah, Sahil Arora. Development and Validation of a HPLC Analytical Assay Method for Amlodipine besylate tablets: A Potent Ca+2 channel blocker. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Education and Research.2012; 2: 93-100.
30. Akiful Haque M, Shanthi Priya DK, Dibyalochan Mohanty, Vasudha Bakshi, Narender Boggula. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Amlodipine in Human Plasma Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry. Asian Journal Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2018; 11:393-7.
31. Bhide Neha, Salgar Jyoti, Shaikh Shaheen. LC-UV Method Development and Validation of Amlodipine in Pure and Tablet dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 5:1-3.
32. Hemant Jain K, Rahul Mane K. Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Amlodipine besylate in Human Plasma using RP-HPLC. International Journal of PharmTech Research.2016; 9: 233-9.
33. Rami Ali Mohammed Osman, Abdalla Ahmed Elbashir. A High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic (HPLC) Method for the Determination of Amlodipine Drug in Dosage form Using 1, 2-Naphthoquine-4-Sulfonate (NQS). Journal of Analytical and Pharmaceutical Research.2017; 6: 1-7.
34. Chandra Dinda S, Desireddy RB, Jitendra Kumar P, Sai Chand A, Srinivasa Rao P, Ashok Kumar B. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC method for qunatitative analysis of Amlodipine besylate in pure and Pharmaceutical formulations. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2013; 6:204-7.
35. Ravinder Burugu. RP-HPLC Determination of Amlodipine from Tablet Dosage Forms. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry.2010; 3(3): 656-658.
36. Ravi Tiwari N, Nishit Shah, Vikas Bhalani, Anand Mahajan. LC, MSn and LC–MS/MS studies for the Characterization of Degradation Products of Amlodipine. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2015; 5:33-42.
37. Akshay Waghmare, Ganesh Taware, Shrikrishna Baokar, Santosh Undare. Ecofriendly Validated Spectrophotometric Method for the Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate by using Hydrotropic Solubilization Method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis.2019; 9(1): 08-10.
38. Rajesh Varma, Praveen Kumar Jampana, Raveendra Babu G, Sri Lakshmi Surekha P, Kala Praveen P, Sambhasiva Rao P. UV Spectroscopic Method for Estimation of Amlodipine besylate in Tablets. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemical and Biological Sciences. 2014; 4: 69-73.
39. Harshal Ashok Pawar, Akansha Yadav. Development and Application of RP-HPLC Method for Dissolution Study of Oral Formulations Containing Amlodipine besylate. Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta. 2015; 6:1-6.
40. Logoyda LS, Korobko DB. Validation of Assay Method of Amlodipine in tablets by Liquid Chromatography. Ukrainian Biopharmaceutical Journal.2016; 6: 80-4.
41. Yucel Kadioglu, Murat Ozturk. Spectrofluorimetric Determination of Amlodipine in human plasma without derivatization. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 48:719-25.
42. Rajeev Gupta K, Anand Chaurasia, Brijesh Mishra K, Vibha Chaturvedi, Pratik Gupta K. Estimation of Amlodipine in human plasma by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017; 3: 57-63.
43. Anusak Sirikatitham, Kamon Panrat, Niwan Tanmanee. Determination of Amlodipine in Human Plasma by Electrospray ionization LC-MS/MS method: Validation and its Stability Studies. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology.2008; 30: 455-62.
44. Chan Lv Mei, Chun Wei Min, Fan Bu Long, Rui Chen, Xiao Wan Lu, Rong Li, Ben Wang Jei, Rui Guo Chen. Determination of Amlodipine in Human Plasma by LC-MS/MS and Its Bioequivalence Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects. Pharmacology and Pharmacy. 2013; 4: 191-200.
45. Moses Prince Francis, Selvadurai Muralidharan, Sekar Rajan, Nagarajan, Bhojraj Suresh. Simple and Validated Method for Estimation of Amlodipine by LC-MS (ESI) Using Healthy Indian Human Volunteers: and Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters. Journal of Bioanalysis and Biomedicine.2010; 2: 69-74.
46. Rhoda Lee C, Harriet Bryson M. A Review of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties and Therapeutic Potential in the Treatment of Hypertension. Drugs. 2012; 48: 274-96. Available from URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.2165/00003495-199448020-00010
47. Lacidipine, Drug Bank. Available from URL: https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB09236.
48. Pankaj Kisan Chatki, Kishore Kumar Hotha, Pandu Ranga Reddy Kolagatla, Vijaya Bharathi D, Venkateswarulu V. LC-MS/MS determination and pharmacokinetic Study of Lacidipine in Human Plasma. Biomedical Chromatography.2012; 27: 838-45.
49. Maasma Shaik, Sunandamma, Srinivasa Reddy Ch. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Assay Method for Determination of Lacidipine in tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research.2019; 11: 2204-7.
50. Mannur Vinodh, Mastiholimath Vinayak, Kharya Rahul, Patware Pankaj. Development and Validation of A HPLC Method for the Determination of Lacidipine in Pure Form and in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences.2012; 16: 213-9.
51. Nagaraju PT, Channabasavaraj KP, Shantha Kumar PT, Chiranjeevi K. UV Spetrophotometric Method Development and Validation for determination of Lacidipine in Pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of ChemTech Research.2011; 3: 955-8.
52. Kharat VR, Verma KK, Dhake JD. Determination of Lacidipine from Urine by HPTLC using off-line SPE. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2002; 28: 789-93.
53. Rajavel A, Sanmuga Priya E, Senthamil Selvan P, Rajagopal K, Durga Mallikarjuna Rao Tippa. Stability indicating Method Development and Validation for the Determination of Lacidipine in tablets. International Research Journal of Pharmacy.2011; 2: 157-61.
54. Arivozhi Mohan, Hitesh Patel B, Dhandayutham Saravanan. Development and Validation of a Reversed-Phase Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for Assay of Lacidipine and Related Substances. Journal of AOAC International. 2011; 94: 1800-6.
55. Reversed Phase UPLC Method for Related Substances and Stability Indicating Assay for Lacidipine. Chapter 5: 137-178. Available from URL:https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/4806/13/13_chapter%205.pdf
56. Sagar Suman Panda, Ravi Kumar Venkata Varaha Bera, Sasmita Kumari Acharjya, Padmalaya Sahoo, Sarwar Beg. Analytical lifecycle management approach: Application to Development of a reliable LC method for estimation of Lacidipine. Separation Science Plus. 2019; 2: 18-25.
57. Mohd Qumbar, Ameeduzzafar, Javed Ali, Syed Sarim Imam, Mohd Fazil, Asgar Ali. DOE-Based Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Lacidipine in Niosomal Gel in Rat: Pharmacokinetic Determination. Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta. 2014; 5: 1-11.
58. Dandu Girija, Akkimi Padma, Tirupathireddy A, Basu Venkateswara Reddy. Estimation of Lacidipine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form by Zero Order, and First Order Derivative UV Spectrophotometric Methods. PharmaTutor. 2019; 7: 73-78.
59. Bin Yang, Chunnuan Wu, Bin Ji, Mingrui Wu, Zhonggui He, Lei Shang, Jin Sun. Virtual population pharmacokinetic using physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for evaluating bioequivalence of oral Lacidipine formulations in dogs. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017; 12: 98-104.
60. Rupesh Shirodkar K, Pallavi Krishna Shetty, Shaila Lewis, Lalit Kumar, Srinivas Mutalik. Development and Validation of a Reverse Phase HPLC Method for the Estimation of Lacidipine in Nanoformulations. Latin American Journal of Pharmacy. 2015; 34: 1162-6.
61. Rex Brogden N, Eugene M Sorkin M. Isradipine An Update of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties and Therapeutic Efficacy in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hypertension. Drug Evaluation. 1995; 49: 618-49.
62. Donald Vidt G, Alan Bakst. Isradipine in the Treatment of Hypertension: a Clinical Profile. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.1990; 57: 677-84.
63. Pasumarthy Gopal NV, Srinivas VDN, Padma SVN. RP-HPLC Estimation of Isradipine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2008; 20: 6097-102.
64. Mohammad Younus, Imam Pasha S, Mohammed Siddiq, Abbaraju Prasanna Lakshmi. RP- HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimatation of Isradipine in Tablet Dosage Form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2013; 6: 140-2.
65. Laxmi Aswini G, Dachinamoorthy D, Ravi Babu Y, Lakshmi Surekha M, Kumara Swamy G. Development and Validation of Isradipine in Bulk and its Pharmaceutical formulations by RP-HPLC method. International Research Journal of Pharmacy.2012; 3: 131-3.
66. Nageswara Rao R, Nagaragu P, Srinivasulu C, Sumanth Reddy V, Suresh V, Jitendra P. HPLC Method for Estimation of Isradipine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. International Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2004; 2: 345-50.
67. Hitesh Katariya, Jagruti Prajapati. Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Isradipine Loaded into Solid Lipid Nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research.2013; 20: 162-66.
68. Xiaojing Yang, Haiyan Xu, Jingjing Gan Li, Jiayang Li, Yi Jin, Bo Yuan. Quantitative Determination of Isradipine in Dog Plasma by an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013; 8: 312-317.
69. Rodrigo Almeida Simões, Anderson Rodrigo Moraes de Oliveira, Pierina Sueli Bonato. Hollow Fiber-Based Liquid-Phase Microextraction (HF-LPME) of Isradipine and its main metabolite followed by Chiral HPLC analysis: Application to an In vitro Biotransformation study. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.2011; 399: 2435-43.
70. Kiyoko Takamura, Fumiyo Kusu, Hanaa Abdel Wadood, Nawal El Rabbat, Gamal Saleh, Ibrahim Refaat. Redox properties of Isradipine and its Electrochemical Detection in the HPLC Determination of the Compound in Human Serum. Biomedical Chromatography.2000; 14: 453-458.
71. Anil Kumar Meher, Anandan P, Arindam Mukhopadhyay. Estimation of Isradipine in Human Plasma by LC-MS/MS. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry.2011; 4: 750-3.
72. PLENDIL (Felodipine) Extended Release Tablets. FDA Product Document. Available from URL:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/019834s025lbl.pdf
73. Bhavana G, Indira Priyadarshini G, Apuroopa. Method Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC for the Estimation of Felodipine PR Tablets. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis.2020; 10(4):207-212.
74. Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna, Rajesh Pudi, Pramadvara Kallepalli. Ultra-Fast Liquid Chromatographic Method (Stability-Indicating) for the Determination of Felodipine. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences.2017; 10: 759-63.
75. Santhosh Kumar P, Srinivasa Rao K, Abdul A, Prasad UV, Nanda Kumar Y, Sarma, PVGK. Validation, Quantitative and Qualitative Qnalysis of Felodipine drug using HPLC. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2012; 5: 1838-40.
76. Santosh Chhajed S, Sandeep Sonawane S, Vaibhav Patil P, Jugal Mandan, Sanjay Kshirsagar J. Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Estimation of Felodipine Using Green Solvent in Tablet Formulation. Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018; 2: 13-15.
77. Madhukar A, Ganesh Kumar Y, Usha K, Srilatha M. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Felodipine in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form by Using RP-HPLC Techniques. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2017; 9: 3248-53.
78. Ravindra J Jarag and A.R. Paradkar. Development and Validation of Method for Quantitative Estimation of Felodipine Agglomerates by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry.2010; 4(1):88-90.
79. Srinivas Reddy, Jibin V Joseph, Aravind Kumar, Arindam Mukhopadhyay, Saral Thangam. Method development and validation for estimation of Felodipine in human plasma by LCMS/MS. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry.2013; 6(3): 263-267.
80. Nataraj KS, Suresh Kumar S, Badrud Duza M, Kesinath reddy K. Method Validation and Estimation of Felodipine in Pure and Capsule Dosage Form by RP-HPLC. Journal of Pharmacy Research.2011; 4: 2822-3.
81. Jain PS, Ansari NA, Surana SJ. HPTLC and RP-HPTLC Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Felodipine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulation. Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta. 2018; 9: 1-6.
82. Pramadvara Kallepalli, Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna. A New Stability Indicating Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Quantification of Felodipine. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics.2018; 12: S597-602.
83. Sreedevi V, Putta Rajesh Kumar, Rajesh Thatavarti. LC-MS Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Felodipine in Human Plasma and Stability Studies of Freeze Thaw Analyte. International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research. 2011; 2: 65-73.
84. Liandong Hu, Qiaofeng Hu, Na Gao. Validated, Stability-Indicating HPLC Method for the Determination of Felodipine and its Related Substances. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research.2011; 2: 65-73.
85. Mathrusri Annapurna M, Sai Pavan Kumar B, Goutam SVS. Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for the Determination of Felodipine (A Calcium Channel Blocker) in Tablets. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research..2013; 3: 9277-85.
86. Aravind Setti, Phazna Devi Takhelmayum, Praveen Kumar Reddy Y, Srikanth Sarikonda, Venkateshwara Rao J, Smita Pawar C. Method Development, Validation and Stability Studies of Felodipine by RP HPLC and Molecular Interaction Studies of Felodipine and Voltage Gated L-type Calcium Channel. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research.2014; 24: 15-20.
87. Füsun Gedil Üstün, Osman Üstün, Okan Atay. Quantitative Determination of Felodipine in Pharmaceuticals by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography and UV Spectroscopy. Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2004; 1: 65-76.
88. Mohamed Walash, Fathalla Belal, Nahed El Enany, Sahar Zayed. Micellar Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Felodipine in Tablets and Human Plasma with Fluorescence Detection: Application to Stability Studies and Content Uniformity Testing. Analytical Methods.2014; 6: 3401.
89. Morgan Snider E, Donald Nuzum S, Angie Veverka. Long-acting Nifedipine in the Management of the Hypertensive Patient. Vasc. Health Risk Management. 2008; 4: 1249-57.
90. PROCARDIA, Nifedipine Capsules for oral use. Available from URL:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/018482s051lbl.pdf. Accessed on: July 2013
91. Bhardwaj Shalini, Gupta MK, Bhalla V. Method development and validation of stability indicating UPLC assay method for Nifedipine. International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs.2015; 3: 24-42.
92. Krishna Sankaa, Rakesh Gullapellia, Narmada Patila, Padmanabha Rao A, Prakash Divana V. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Nifedipine and its Application for a Novel Proniosomal Formulation Analysis and Dissolution Study. Der Pharma Chemica.2014; 6: 279-89.
93. Shah SA, Savale SS, Rathod IS, Shishoo CJ. Development a sensitive HPLC Method for Determination of Plasma Levels of Nifedipine. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.1999; 61: 81-85.
94. P Thulasamma and P Venkateswarlu. RP-HPLC method for the quantitative determination of Nifedipine in dosage forms, human milk and urine. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011; 5(3): 322-327.
95. Ismail K Md, Lakshmana Rao MV, Basaveswara Rao A. Estimation of Nifedipine in K2EDTA Human Plasma using UHPLC-MS/MS Method. International Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Chemistry.2017; 7: 577-84.
96. Tulasamma P, Venkateswarlu P. Spectrophotometric Determination of Nifedipine in Pharmaceutical Formulations, Serum and Urine Samples via Oxidative Coupling Reaction. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2012; 2: 1-7.
97. Mosab Arafat, Zahaa Ahmed, Momir Mikov. Determination of Nifedipine in Rat Plasma using HPLC-UV Detector: A Simple Method for Pharmacokinetics and Oral Bioavailability Studies. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.2016; 8: 98-102.
98. Srinivasa Rao Baratam, Kalyan Chakravarthy Janjanam, Vijaya Ratna J. Determination of Nifedipine in Human Plasma by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry and its Validation. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.2018; 7: 678-91.
99. Srinivasa Reddy, Iqbal Ahmad, Nirmala Naya, Saral Thangam, Arindam Mukhopadhyay. Estimation of Nifedipine in Human Plasma by LC-MS/MS. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2013; 6: 83-6.
100. Juan Wei, Wenjuan Ma, Guangzhe Yao, Qi Jia, Xuejing Cheng, Huizi Ouyang, Yanxu Chang, Xiaopeng Chen, Jun He. A High Throughput HPLC-MS/MS Method for Antihypertensive Drugs Determination in Plasma and its Application on Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study with Shuxuetong Injection in Rats.Hindawi BioMed Research International.2019; 4:1-10.
101. Normaizira Hamidi, Mohd Nasir Taib, Wong Tin Wui. Analysis of Nifedipine Content in Transdermal Drug Delivery System using Non-Destructive Visible Spectrophotometry Technique. The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences. 2008; 12: 348-51.
102. Dimal Shah A, Jaimin Patel S, Priyanka Jadeja, Vandana Patel, Usmangani Chhalotiya K.Development of Stability Indicating HPTLC Method for Estimation of Antihypertensive Drug combination Nifedipine and Valsartan. Journal of Taibah University For Science. 2019; 13:722-30.
103. Gabriela Campos de Oliveira Filgueira, Osmany Alberto Silva Filgueira, Daniela Miarelli Carvalho, Maria Paula Marques, Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés, Geraldo Duarte, Vera Lucia Lanchote, Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli. Analysis of Nifedipine in Human Plasma and Amniotic Fluid by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and its Application to Clinical Pharmacokinetics In Hypertensive Pregnant Women. Journal of Chromatography B.2015; 993-994: 20-5.
104. Hisham Abou Auda S, Tawfeeg Najjar A, Khalil Al Khamis I, Badraddin Al Hadiya M, Nausha Ghilzai M, Nasser Al Fawzan F. Liquid Chromatographic Assay of Nifedipine in Human Plasma and its Application to Pharmacokinetic Studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2010; 22: 241-49.
105. Mayte Gil Agusti, Samuel Carda Broch, LI Monferrer Pons, Esteve Romeo JS. Photostability studies for Micellar Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Nifedipine in Serum and Urine Samples. Biomedical Chromatography.2006; 20: 154-60.
106. Mohd Dzul Hakim Wirzal, Abdull Rahim Mohd Yusoff, Jiri Zima, Jiri Barek. Voltammetric Determination of Nifedipine at a Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode and a Mercury Meniscus Modified Silver Amalgam Electrode. International Journal of Electrochemical Science.2015; 10: 4571-84.
107. Rosseel MT, Bogaert MG. Determination of Nifedipine in Human Plasma by Capillary Gas Chromatography with Nitrogen Detection. Journal of Chromatography A.1983; 279:675-80.
108. Lawrence Lesko J, Ann Miller K, Russell Yeager L, Dulal Chatterji C. Rapid GC method for Quantitation of Nifedipine in Serum using Electron Capture Detection. Journal of Chromatographic Science.1983; 21:415-9.
109. Soumitra Kumar. Brief Review, Hypertension management: Old drug revisited – Cilnidipine. Journal of Clinical and Preventive Cardiology. 2017; 6: 24-6.
110. Safety Data Sheet of Cilnidipine. Toronto Research Chemicals.Version 5.0 Available from URL:https://www.trc-canada.com/prod-img/MSDS/C441375MSDS.pdf
111. Compound Summary on Cilnidipine.PubCem.US National Library of Medicine, National Centre for Biotechnology Information. Available from URL:https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5282138
112. Kazuko Tajiril, Jean-Baptiste Guichard, Xiaoyan Qi, Feng Xiong, Patrice Naud, Jean Claude Tardif, Antoine Da Costa, Kazutaka Aonuma, Stanley Nattel. An N-/L-Type Calcium Channel Blocker, Cilnidipine, Suppresses Autonomic, Electrical, and.with Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research.2019; 115: 1975-85.
113. Preeti Dharpur M, Kavitha VC.A study at BRIMS hospital for Comparing the Tolerability of Cilnidipine and Amlodipine in the Treatment of Hypertension. Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2019; 6: 11-3.
114. Prabhakar Adake HS, Somashekar P, Mohammed Rafeeq K, Dilshad Umar, Bahija Basheer, Kusai Baroudi. Comparison of Amlodipine with Cilnidipine on Antihypertensive Efficacy and Incidence of Pedal Edema in Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Individuals: A Prospective Study. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology and Research.2015; 6: 81-5.
115. Sameera Gopinath, Vadakkedath Venugopal Harishkumar, Vediyera Chandroth Santhosh, Sreekanth Puthalath. Case report on low dose of Cilnidipine: A fourth-generation Calcium Channel Blocker-Induced Gingival Overgrowth. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2019; 23:377-80.
116. Selvadurai Muralidharan, Jaya Raja Kumar, Sokkalingam Arumugam Dhanaraj. Simple and Effective HPLC Method Development and its Validation for Cilnidipine in Human Drug Free Plasma. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2015; 28:135-8.
117. Mohammed Safhi M. Spectrophotometric Method for the Estimation of Cilnidipine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage forms. Oriental Journal of Chemistry.2013; 29: 131-134.
118. Sankar, Swathi V, Srinivasa Babu, Ravi P. Development and Validation of Novel UV and RP-HPLC Methods for Determination of Cilnidipine (A New Generation Ca Channel Blocker) in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research.2019; 10: 1886-94.
119. Tiwari Balakrishna, Shirsat Mrunal K, Kulkarni Amol.Development and Validation of Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Cilnidipine Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics.2020; 10: 97-100.
120. Mohammed Safhi M. Spectrophotometric Estimation of Cilnidipine in Tablets. British Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.2015; 7: 451-56.
121. Kokilambigai KS, Lakshmi KS, Amlesh Kumar, Govind Chandrayan, Kumar Satyam, Mantosh Kumar Singh. Spectrophotometric Estimation of Cilnidipine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form using N-(1-Naphthyl) Ethylene Diamine Dihydrochloride. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.2014; 6: 576-8.
122. Karmalkar HS, Vaidya VV, Gomes NA, Choukekar MP, Kekare MB. Determination of Cilnidipine from Pharmaceutical Formulation by High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Method. Analytical Chemistry. An Indian Journal.2008; 7: 573-6.
123. Heon Woo Lee, Ji Hyung Seo, Hyun Su Lee, Seo young Jeong, Young WukCho, Kyung Tae Lee.Development of a Liquid Chromatography/Negative-Ion Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay for the Determination of Cilnidipine in Human Plasma and its Application to a Bioequivalence Study. Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.2008; 862: 246-51.
124. Mohammed M Safhi and Manohara Yagaina Nagaraj. Development and validation of a Rapid Stability Indicating chromatographic determination of Cilnidipine in Bulk and Dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2013; 6(3):296-299.
Received on 14.12.2020 Modified on 05.02.2021
Accepted on 11.03.2021 ©AJRC All right reserved
Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2021; 14(3):221-234.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-4150.2021.00039